Skip to main content
· 8/2/2006

Kathleen Sanford, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael R. Sanford v. Pamela Stiles Dennis Murphy East Penn School District

Citations

  • 456 F.3d 298
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19428
  • 2006 WL 2161404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that “where deliberation is possible and officials have the time to make unhurried judgments, deliberate indifference is sufficient” to shock the conscience
  • ruling that “where deliberation is possible and officials have the time to make unhurried judgments, deliberate indifference is sufficient” to shock the conscience
  • holding that the custody exception applies only where there is a “‘deprivation of liberty’ through, for example, incarceration or institutionalization”
  • holding that “in order for municipal liability to exist, there must still be a violation of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.”
  • recognizing that “the term ‘willful misconduct’ is synonymous with the term ‘intentional tort’” (citation omitted)
  • holding that the defendants failure to prevent a student’s suicide could not be re-characterized as an affirmative action and, thus, did not form the basis of a due process violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Becker, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.