Kathleen R. v. City of Livermore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that public library was immune from suit under Section 230 because it provided an interactive computer service by enabling multiple users to access the internet through its public computers
• rejecting argument that § 230 immunity was limited to tort claims, holding immunity extends to a taxpayer's action for declaratory and injunctive relief
• rejecting argument that § 230 immunity was limited to tort claims, holding immunity extends to a taxpayer’s action for declaratory and injunctive relief
• library providing Internet access to the public by use of computers qualified as an ICS provider or user
• ac tions and claims for declaratory and in-junctive relief are no less causes of action than tort claims for damages, and thus fall squarely within the section 230(e)(3) prohibition.
• distinguishing Loudoun on these grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).