Kathleen Makinen v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It does not matter that Presidio has sued AVX over capacitors that did not contain the buried metallizations claimed in the [subject] patent.”
• it is “a traditional preclusion principle that neither claim nor issue preclusion applies when appellate review of the decision with a potentially preclusive effect is unavailable”
• it is “a traditional preclusion principle that neither claim nor issue preclusion applies when appellate review of the decision with a potentially preclusive effect is unavailable”
• it is “a traditional preclusion principle that neither claim nor issue preclusion applies when appellate review of the decision with a potentially preclusive effect is unavailable”
• \Article III requirements do not apply to administrative agencies.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).