Kathleen M. Anderson v. Janet Reno, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the Evans rule in passing, while holding that plaintiff’s claims were timely under the continuing violation rule
• noting that if a plaintiff, who had 12 concededly exhausted a sex discrimination claim tried to assert a different theory of 13 discrimination (e.g. racial discrimination), the race discrimination claim could not be 14 considered exhausted and would thus be barred.
• finding a hostile work environment where a supervisor repeatedly referred to the 7 employee as “office sex goddess,” “sexy,” and “the good little girl”
• “[E]ven if not actionable in and of themselves, untimely claims serve as relevant background evidence to put timely claims in context.”
• “[Ejven if not actionable in and of themselves, untimely claims serve as relevant background evidence to put timely claims in.context.”
• Federal Bureau of Investigation agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).