Kathleen Lentini v. California Center for the Arts, Escondido Alan Corbin Randy Vogel, and Does 1-10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that because Title III of the ADA 19 “prohibits discrimination ‘by any person who owns, leases (or leases to
• determining that because Title III of the ADA “prohibits discrimination ‘by any person who owns, leases (or leases to
• stating that a district court’s conclusions of law following a bench trial are reviewed de novo
• refusing to 6 || consider argument raised for the first time in reply; noting opposing party had no 7 || Opportunity to respond
• refusing to entertain an 25 argument alleged for the first time in a reply brief because the opposing party “ha[d] not been given the opportunity to respond”
• following a bench trial, “[w]e will not disturb an award of damages unless it is clearly unsupported by the evidence, or it shocks the conscience” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).