Kathleen Koszola v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “summary judgment is the ‘put up or shut up’ moment in a lawsuit, when a party must show what evidence it has that would convince a trier of fact to accept its version of events.” (quotation omitted)
• “[A] district court is entitled to decide the motion based on the factual record outlined in the [Local Rule 56.1] statements.” (internal quota‐ tion marks omitted)
• “This court reviews the decision of a district court concerning compli- ance with local rules, such as Rule 56.1, only for an abuse of discretion.”
• statement admissible under 801(d)(2)(D) even though district court refused to consider it because it lacked proper evidentiary founda- tion
• “[0]ur de novo review of [the district court’s] grant of summary judgment will likewise rest only on the [defendant’s] Local Rule 56.1(a) statement and [the plaintiff’s] Local Rule 56.1(b) response.”
• “[O]ur de novo review of [the district court’s] grant of summary judgment will likewise rest only on the [defendant’s] Local Rule 56.1(a) statement and [the plaintiff’s] Local Rule 56.1(b) response.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).