Kathleen A. Shanaghan v. John D. Cahill Cahill & Associates, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that 28 U.S.C. § 1367 codified the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction derived from United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725, 86 S.Ct. 1130, 1138 (1966)
• holding that courts have “wide latitude in determining whether or not to retain jurisdiction over state claims when all federal claims have been extinguished”
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to retain jurisdiction over the state law claims
• holding that a district court “enjoy[s] wide latitude in determining whether or not to retain [supplemental] jurisdiction over state claims”
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to retain jurisdiction over the state law claims
• holding that discretionary supplemental jurisdiction applies when dismissal of claims in a diversity case causes the remaining amount in controversy to fall below the threshold

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).