Kathie Digilio v. True Blue Animal Rescue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the trial court was required, as a matter of due process, to hold a full evidentiary hearing prior to imposing sanctions
• awarding appellate attorney’s fees as a sanction for a frivolous defense of a “patently erroneous” trial court order
• holding “the trial court erred as a matter of law by failing to consider the totality of the circumstances present in this case, instead considering only the time reasonably expended and the reasonable hourly rate for the services.” (quoting Poletz, 652 So. 2d at 369)
• “We also find cases from other jurisdictions persuasive in holding that withdrawing from a case because of a bar suspension constitutes withdrawing on one’s own volition.”
• “[I]f the trial court were basing the prejudgment interest on the ‘agreement’ of the parties, then interest would not accrue until Dr. Santini actually received the proceeds (sometime after September 26, 2007
• section 57.105 does not allow for the recovery of costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).