Katherine M. Meyer v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that evi- dence of habit/routine is weighed “in the same manner that any other evidence would be weighed” and in this regard any “[c]onflicting evidence raises an issue of fact” which is reviewed for clear error
• stating that “evidence of habit or routine was to be weighed and considered by the trier of the facts in the same manner as any other type of direct or circumstantial evidence,” and “weight to be given to any testimony depends upon the particular circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).