Katherine M. CHAMBERLIN, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. 101 REALTY, INC., Et Al., Defendants, Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no hostile work environment existed despite plaintiff s supervisor having made five sexual advances towards plaintiff within a five-week time period
• expressing doubt as to whether five sexual comments made over the course of a four to five-week period constituted harassment severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment
• five instances of inappropriate comments about employee’s appearance and/or sexual advances not sufficiently severe or pervasive to sustain hostile work environment allegation
• “sexual harassment under Title VII may be actionable as ‘quid pro quo’ harassment and as ‘hostile environment’ discrimination.”
• “there is no reason that a discharge from employment occurring in ... [a hostile] environment could not constitute quid pro quo harassment as well”
• the \unwelcomeness\ of sexual advances necessitates a finding of uninvited and offensive conduct from the standpoint of the employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).