Skip to main content
· 1/6/2004

Katherine M. Albers v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 644
  • 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 389
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 71
  • 2004 WL 26782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “One good reason to exercise discretion against dismissal is to curtail strategic behavior.” (citations omitted)
  • “[T]here is a presumption in favor of dismissal, but the procedure is not automatic.” (citing Hope Clinic v. Ryan, 249 F.3d 603 (7th Cir. 2001) (en banc); Margulin v. CHS Acquisition Corp., 889 F.2d 122 (7th Cir. 1989))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.