· 1/6/2004
Katherine M. Albers v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Citations
- 354 F.3d 644
- 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 389
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 71
- 2004 WL 26782
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “One good reason to exercise discretion against dismissal is to curtail strategic behavior.” (citations omitted)
- “[T]here is a presumption in favor of dismissal, but the procedure is not automatic.” (citing Hope Clinic v. Ryan, 249 F.3d 603 (7th Cir. 2001) (en banc); Margulin v. CHS Acquisition Corp., 889 F.2d 122 (7th Cir. 1989))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.