Katherine Ann Shaw v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once the government initiated civil proceedings against the plaintiff, she could not ignore those procedures and pursue a Rule 41(e) (now Rule 41(g)) motion
• claimant who failed to pursue remedy in forfeiture proceeding was properly denied return of property under Rule 41(e)
• claimant who failed to pursue remedy in forfeiture proceeding was properly denied return of property under Rule 41(e)
• “Under standard equity doctrine, where there is an adequate remedy at law it must be pursued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).