Katharina Holland v. Sam's Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting this court ordinarily does not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal
• noting this court ordinarily does not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal
• finding that a “transfer from operating a forklift in the warehouse to being a stocker in electronics” was not an adverse employment action because it “involved no change in pay or benefits and only minor changes in . . . working conditions”
• “nonmoving party must designate the specific genuine issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment”; arguments waived in the district court may not be considered on appeal
• plaintiff “clearly failed” to establish prima facie case where her only evidence was “a document identifying job titles, which uses vague and unexplained titles to describe the employees’ positions”
• “Because Holland filed her charge of discrimination on January 2, 2004, only those acts occurring within 300 days of January 2, 2004, that is, after March 8, 2003, are actionable under Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).