Skip to main content
· 11/28/1952

Kath v. Kath

Citations

  • 238 Minn. 120
  • 55 N.W.2d 691
  • 1952 Minn. LEXIS 759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging rule that courts will refuse to exert their powers to extricate a party from the consequences of their own dishonesty
  • presumption dictates decision in absence of evidence to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matson, Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.