Kates Corp. v. Kirshenbaum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this Court “must treat the sufficiency of defendant’s letter to satisfy [the statute of frauds] as a question of law rather than a question of fact”
• signature on separate writing; no intent to authenticate found

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).