Skip to main content
· 4/24/2003

Kassim v. City of Schenectady

Citations

  • 221 F.R.D. 363
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25535
  • 2003 WL 23484552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving removal of a Rule 202 petition based on diversity jurisdiction; in remanding, Judge Fitzwater first noted that “[t]he majority of Texas courts that have considered whether a Rule 202 proceeding is removable have held that it is not” (citing various cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.