Skip to main content
· 3/30/2010

Kassim v. CARLISLE INTERESTS, INC.

Citations

  • 308 S.W.3d 537
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 2852
  • 2010 WL 1224382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] trial court generally has no duty to dissolve an injunction unless fundamental error has occurred or conditions have changed.”
  • “The parties do not assert, nor does the record reflect, any changed circumstances or conditions. Because KAI’s issues concerning irreparable harm and default under the Lease pertain to the propriety of the initial award of injunctive relief, they are outside the scope of our review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justices Richter, Lang-Miers, and Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.