Kasper v. Board of Appeals of Watertown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There was nothing in the evidence to suggest that the plaintiff was prejudiced in any way by the board’s failure to send him written notice”
• where abutter and his son had actual notice of public hearing by second publication twelve days in advance of hearing, abutter had reasonable time to prepare and was not prejudiced by board's failure to send him written notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).