Kash v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff requested accommodation during disciplinary hearing for falling asleep on the job
• plaintiff’s “inability to sleep for more than four hours per night by itself was not sufficient,” where he gave “no reason . . . to revisit the cases that the district court relied on,” including Scheerer and Squibb
• “We have . . . reasoned that an employee’s disability will not preclude an employer from imposing discipline, up to and including discharge, for the employee’s violation of a workplace rule, even when there is a connection between the disability and the violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).