Skip to main content
· 8/20/1991

Kaser v. Swann

Citations

  • 141 F.R.D. 337
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16028
  • 1991 WL 323438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a witness who agrees to receive consideration which is different than the fees and allowances provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1821 in return for expert testimony, is “retained” or “specially employed to provide expert testimony”
  • finding that a “preliminary report” is not contemplated by Rule 26

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.