Skip to main content
· 8/28/2003

Kaser v. Financial Protection Marketing, Inc.

Citations

  • 831 A.2d 49
  • 376 Md. 621
  • 2003 Md. LEXIS 521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a tortious interference plaintiff must show “actual damage and loss”
  • finding against insurance subagent who alleged tortious interference against general agent but lacked an economic relationship with the client that was separate and independent
  • finding against insurance subagent who alleged tortious interference against general agent but lacked an economic relationship with the client that was separate and independent
  • “[T]he tort of wrongful interference with economic relations will not lie where the defendant is a party to the economic relationship with which the defendant has allegedly interfered.”
  • Wrongful interference with contractual or business relations is comprised of: “(1) intentional and wilful acts; (2) calculated to cause damage to the plaintiffs in their lawful business; (3
  • Wrongful interference with contractual or business relations is comprised of: “(1) intentional and wilful acts; (2) calculated to cause damage to the plaintiffs in their lawful business; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.