Skip to main content
· 11/23/1993

Kascewicz v. Citibank, N.A.

Citations

  • 837 F. Supp. 1312
  • 17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2697
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17221
  • 1993 WL 511771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, in a case where prejudice was found, that “the size of the per diem penalties [in past cases] has ranged from $10 a day to $50 a day, and the aggregate penalties have ranged from $1,500 to over $15,000”
  • someone who is compelled to retain counsel and incur expenses to determine where he stands in relation to an ambiguous plan, has suffered an injury regardless of the ultimate conclusion of eligibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.