· 8/26/2011
Kasalo v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.
Citations
- 656 F.3d 557
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17828
- 2011 WL 3800124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court may deny class certification even before a motion for certification is filed
- holding that a court “need not delay a ruling on certification if it thinks that additional discovery would not be useful in resolving the class determination”
- noting that “a court may deny class certification even before the plaintiff files a motion requesting certification”
- “[The court] need not delay a ruling on class certification if it thinks that additional discovery would not be useful in resolving the class determination.”
- consistent with Rule 23(c)(1)(A), “a court may deny class certification even before the plaintiff files a motion requesting certification.”
- a court “need not delay a ruling on certification if it thinks that additional discovery would not be useful in resolving the class determination.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovner, Wood, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.