Skip to main content
· 8/26/2011

Kasalo v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.

Citations

  • 656 F.3d 557
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17828
  • 2011 WL 3800124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court may deny class certification even before a motion for certification is filed
  • holding that a court “need not delay a ruling on certification if it thinks that additional discovery would not be useful in resolving the class determination”
  • noting that “a court may deny class certification even before the plaintiff files a motion requesting certification”
  • “[The court] need not delay a ruling on class certification if it thinks that additional discovery would not be useful in resolving the class determination.”
  • consistent with Rule 23(c)(1)(A), “a court may deny class certification even before the plaintiff files a motion requesting certification.”
  • a court “need not delay a ruling on certification if it thinks that additional discovery would not be useful in resolving the class determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rovner, Wood, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.