Karts Raceway, Inc.v. McKinnon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Forfeiture Act’s legislative history demonstrates “its aim of preventing those who violate the public’s trust from receiving the benefit of a taxpayer-funded pension”
• ruling that collateral consequence doctrine still applies outside of deportation and concluding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to advise his client about the loss of a pension as a result of his convictions, but not holding that ineffectiveness claim was non-cognizable
• stating, “[a]ccordingly, we hold Padilla did not abrogate application of such analysis in cases that do not involve deportation[]”
• stating, “a defendant's lack of knowledge of collateral consequences of the entry of a guilty plea does not undermine the validity of the plea” (citation omitted)
• \Padilla did not abrogate application of [a direct versus collateral consequences] analysis in cases that do not involve deportation.\
• \Padilla did not abrogate application of [a direct versus collateral consequences] analysis in cases that do not involve deportation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).