Skip to main content
· 12/5/1988

Karsteter v. Graham Cos.

Citations

  • 488 U.S. 981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the range of views on whether psychologists are competent to give an opinion on future dangerousness
  • recognizing the range of views on whether psychologists are competent to give an opinion on future dangerousness
  • noting that criminal defendants generally have the right to plead guilty to charged offenses
  • refusing to construe Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution as a due process clause
  • discussing criminal defendant’s traditional right in Oregon to waive right to jury trial by pleading guilty
  • discussing criminal defendant’s traditional right in Oregon to waive right to jury trial by pleading guilty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.