Skip to main content
· 6/26/1987

Karsten v. McCray

Citations

  • 509 N.E.2d 1376
  • 157 Ill. App. 3d 1
  • 109 Ill. Dec. 364
  • 1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 2673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • barring a doctor’s testimony after the doctor engaged in ex parte communications with defense counsel, despite the fact that the doctor-patient relationship existed only prior to the plaintiff’s injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inglis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.