Skip to main content
· 5/4/2006

Karsten Manufacturing Corporation v. Editoy AG; Editoy B.V.; Pingu B.V.; and Joker, Inc.

Syllabus

whether opposer may amend its oppositions to assert that there exists no basis for registration of applicant's marks under Section 44 and whether opposer is entitled to summary judgment on that ground

Judges: Seeherman, Walters, Kuhlke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.