· 11/21/1984
Karsman v. Portman
Citations
- 325 S.E.2d 608
- 173 Ga. App. 108
- 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2740
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he judgment entered in this case is the grant of a motion for summary judgment and is expressly excluded from the operation of OCGA § 9-11-52 by the clear language of the section”
- “[T]he judgment entered in this case is the grant of a motion for summary judgment and is expressly excluded from the operation of OCGA § 9-11-52 by the clear language of the section.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benham, Banke, Pope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.