Skip to main content
· 11/21/1984

Karsman v. Portman

Citations

  • 325 S.E.2d 608
  • 173 Ga. App. 108
  • 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he judgment entered in this case is the grant of a motion for summary judgment and is expressly excluded from the operation of OCGA § 9-11-52 by the clear language of the section”
  • “[T]he judgment entered in this case is the grant of a motion for summary judgment and is expressly excluded from the operation of OCGA § 9-11-52 by the clear language of the section.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Banke, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.