Karren Y. Hill v. Peoplesoft Usa, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an arbitration agreement required by an employer as a condition of employment was not procedurally or substantively unconscionable under Maryland law
• explaining that “state law determines questions ‘concerning the validity, revocability, or enforceability of contracts generally’” (citation omitted)
• explaining that “state law determines questions ‘concerning the validity, revocability, or enforceability of contracts generally’” (citation omitted)
• explaining that “state law determines questions ‘concerning the validity, revocability, or enforceability of contracts generally’” (citation omitted)
• holding failure to uphold arbitration agreement reversible error even when defendant corporation failed to respond to arbitration demand letter
• holding arbitration clause was not illusory because, unlike in Cheek, the “reservation of rights” was not located in the arbitration agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).