Skip to main content

Karr v. Salido

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1141

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in granting directed verdicts in an automobile injury case where the plaintiff did not have expert medical testimony to show proximate cause between the accident and soft-tissue injuries and did not provide evidence of his vehicle's value immediately before and immediately after the accident. The trial court did not err in denying a motion for a new trial and plaintiff did not show any evidence of judicial bias.

Judges: Jamison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.