Karr v. Castle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a motion for re-argument is not an opportunity to “accomplish repetition of arguments that were or should have been presented to the court previously.”
• reconsideration is not an opportunity to “accomplish repetition of arguments that were or should have been presented to the court previously”
• “The motion for reconsideration should not be used as a substitute for appeal or as a mechanism to present arguments inexcusably omitted in the prior proceeding.”
• Memorandum Opinion implementing prior opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).