Karpova v. Snow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appeals court reviewing summary judgment award on APA claim examines “administrative record de novo without according deference to the decision of the district court”
• noting that section 706(2)(A) 11 Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6
• noting that the arbitrary and capricious standard of review is “narrow” and deferential to the agency
• explaining that due process only requires a fair and meaningful opportunity to be heard
• concluding the Iraq Sanction regulations did not violate due process rights where the plaintiff presented no disputed facts and where different directors signed the pre-penalty notice and the final penalty notice
• “swiftly rejecting]” argument that the Iraq Sanctions regulations exceed the authority Congress gave to the President

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).