Skip to main content
· 6/17/1983

Karpe v. Borough of Stroudsburg

Citations

  • 461 A.2d 859
  • 315 Pa. Super. 185
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that subject matter jurisdiction of appeal involving consideration and interpretation of MPC “lies with the Commonwealth Court”
  • subject matter jurisdiction of appeal involving consideration and interpretation of MPC “lies with the Commonwealth Court”
  • “[I]t would benefit both the public and the municipalities and boroughs operating under the [MPC] if substantive decisions on the statute and its application to damages actions resulting from its enforcement ] were made by one court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Wieand, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.