Karnes v. Runyon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee’s FECA claim will not preclude a subsequent Rehabilitation Act claim
• declining to follow Alexander and holding that an employee’s FECA claim will not operate as a bar to a later action brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act
• considering claims for disability and pregnancy discrimination and concluding that “FECA does not preclude recovery for injuries caused by illegal discrimination”
• where plaintiff unable to perform her' original “keyer clerk” position, the court found that her qualifications should be meásured against the “post-surgery” job she held at the time of the alleged discrimination
• where plaintiff unable to perform her original work “keyer clerk” position, the Court found that her qualification should be measured against the “post-surgery” job she held at the time of the alleged discrimination.
• Rehabilitation Act and Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).