· 6/13/1989
Karnes v. Milo Beauty & Barber Supply Co.
Citations
- 441 N.W.2d 565
- 1989 Minn. App. LEXIS 704
- 1989 WL 61472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no actual malice when sole motivation behind allegedly defamatory statements was proper concern about possible theft
- where no evidence of malice, intra-office memo containing defamatory statements covered by qualified privilege
- where no evidence of malice, intra-office memo containing defamatory statements covered by qualified privilege
- no actual malice absent evidence of personal animosity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.