Skip to main content
· 6/13/1989

Karnes v. Milo Beauty & Barber Supply Co.

Citations

  • 441 N.W.2d 565
  • 1989 Minn. App. LEXIS 704
  • 1989 WL 61472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no actual malice when sole motivation behind allegedly defamatory statements was proper concern about possible theft
  • where no evidence of malice, intra-office memo containing defamatory statements covered by qualified privilege
  • where no evidence of malice, intra-office memo containing defamatory statements covered by qualified privilege
  • no actual malice absent evidence of personal animosity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.