Skip to main content
· 7/1/2004

Karlson v. Harris

Citations

  • 97 P.3d 428
  • 140 Idaho 561
  • 2004 Ida. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing speculation in the context of a challenge to expert testimony
  • trial courts have broad discretion in the admission of expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Kidwell, Eismann, Burdick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.