Karloftis v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that email regarding updates to the user agreement and continued 20 use is enough for notice and assent
• holding that the agreement was enforceable where the notice language matched the button
• reasoning that, for conflict of laws purposes, the “BIPA manifests Illinois’ substantial policy of protecting its citizens’ right to privacy in their personal biometric data”
• drawing a distinction, which this Opinion does not adopt, between digital photographs and physical photographs
• analyzing claims brought against Facebook based on BIPA and finding that “user-uploaded photographs to create a ‘unique digital representation of the face’” constitutes a facial geometry scan
• scanning “user-uploaded photographs to create a ‘unique digital representation of the face . . . based on [the] geometric relationship of [] facial features” constituted a scan of face geometry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).