Karla J. Markel v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the denial of “better” equipment was not a “readily quantifiable loss” the discrimination laws were meant to redress
• noting that adverse employment actions are generally economic but not reaching issue of whether university employee had suffered adverse employment action
• finding supervisors’ statements made “nearly two months” before employee’s termination were not contemporaneous to the termina- tion and thus were not evidence of discrimination
• no evidence that supervisor’s “abusive” and “rude” treatment of plaintiff was motivated by her race or gender
• denial of “better” equipment not actionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).