Skip to main content
· 12/17/2010

Karl Schmidt Unisia, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers, UAW Local 2357

Citations

  • 628 F.3d 909
  • 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2052
  • 189 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2999
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25798
  • 2010 WL 5128942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that dispute over employee-incentive program was arbitrable where CBA grievance clause covered “any violation of this agreement”
  • affirming district court order compelling arbitration of grievance over employee eligibility for supplemental retirement benefits under pension plan
  • explain- ing that it is the union’s understanding of their grievance claim, not the Company’s characterization of it, that guides our consideration of whether the claim is arbitrable
  • \The language of the CBA's arbitration clause forms the basis of our analysis.\
  • \The language of the CBA's arbitration clause forms the basis of our analysis.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Kanne, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.