Karl ONSTAD, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “absent unfairness or prejudice, we will not remand”
• holding that “absent unfairness or prejudice, we will not remand”
• noting that while results of psychological testing were not included in the record, an expert’s summary of that testing was
• holding remand not warranted where claimant was treated fairly and failed to show that he was prejudiced
• holding “absent prejudice or unfairness, we will not remand.”
• holding “absent prejudice or unfairness, we will not remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).