Karl Kallmann, D/B/A Love's Barbeque Restaurant, No. 62, and Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, And

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice
• stating that Burns held that \a successor employer is ordinarily free to set initial hiring terms without preliminary bargaining with the incumbent union\
• holding that \an appropriate back pay remedy cannot require Kallmann to pay the higher rate [in the prede- cessor's CBA] beyond a period allowing for a reasonable time of bargaining\ because \Kallmann would not have agreed to union demands to pay the higher rate\
• fact that only seven of predecessor’s forty employees applied for job with successor employer did not preclude bargaining order against successor when successor resorted to unusual hiring procedures designed to conceal the availability of jobs from those employees
• fact that only seven of predecessor's forty employees applied for job with successor employer did not preclude bargaining order against successor when successor resorted to unusual hiring procedures designed to conceal the availability of jobs from those employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).