Karic v. Major Automotive Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding common pay practices coupled with common ownership was sufficient to conditionally certify a class consisting of all the entities
• granting certification across all of defendants’ car dealerships when plaintiffs alleged “common ownership and control of all of the[] entities, including the three dealerships for which no plaintiff has yet appeared”
• reasoning that “common ownership” supports the same inference
• conditionally certifying a collective where plaintiffs worked at only six of nine defendant car dealerships

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).