Kargman v. Commissioner of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “statutes should be interpreted as a whole to constitute a consistent and harmonious provision”
• “statutes should be interpreted as a whole to constitute a consistent and harmonious provision”
• “statutes should be interpreted as a whole to constitute a consistent and harmonious provision”
• “statutes should be interpreted as a whole to constitute a consistent and harmonious provision”
• “statutes should be interpreted as a whole to constitute a consistent and harmonious provision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).