Skip to main content
· 3/16/1981

Karen Pineman v. William G. Oechslin

Citations

  • 637 F.2d 601
  • 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1248
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 19199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \only those arrangements enforceable as contractual obligations under state law are protected by the Contract Clause against impairment\
  • \Federal courts test only whether a state act violates some specific check on state power contained in the federal constitution\
  • “[T]he federal courts, thereafter resolving the constitutional issue, will not be obliged to give the state court ruling the conclusive deference that abstention normally entails”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Lumbard, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.