· 3/16/1981
Karen Pineman v. William G. Oechslin
Citations
- 637 F.2d 601
- 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1248
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 19199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \only those arrangements enforceable as contractual obligations under state law are protected by the Contract Clause against impairment\
- \Federal courts test only whether a state act violates some specific check on state power contained in the federal constitution\
- “[T]he federal courts, thereafter resolving the constitutional issue, will not be obliged to give the state court ruling the conclusive deference that abstention normally entails”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Lumbard, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.