Skip to main content
· 4/18/2024

Karen Molina Thompson v. John Deere Construction & Forestry Company and Deere Credit Services, Inc. D/B/A John Deere Financial

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “positioned” describes where the “means is located and is a separate limitation not subject to section 112, paragraph 6[.]”
  • holding that means-plus-function claim construction is limited to language that described what the function is and does not extend to other language, such as language describing where the means is located
  • “Construction of [a means-plus-function] ■ limitation requires the court to first identify the function of the means-plus-function limitation.”
  • “[N]ext [the court must] identify the corresponding structure in the written description necessary to perform that function.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.