Skip to main content
· 12/24/2015

Karen McQuistion v. City of Clinton, Iowa Mark Regenwether Jeffrey Farwell And Jeffrey Horne

Citations

  • 872 N.W.2d 817
  • 2015 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 104
  • 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,463
  • 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claims of equal protection and due process on the merits, but remanding on the question of pregnancy discrimination under the Iowa Civil Rights Act
  • adopting a new standard for the evaluation of a pregnancy claim and remanding the case to the district court to apply that standard
  • applying the McDonnell Douglas framework at summary judgment when indirect evidence is used to infer discrimination under the ICRA
  • rejecting claims of equal protection and due process on the merits, but remanding on the question of pregnancy discrimination under the Iowa Civil Rights Act
  • rejecting claims of equal protection and due process on the merits, but remanding on the question of pregnancy discrimination under the Iowa Civil Rights Act
  • stating that there is a fundamental right to procreate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.