· 8/5/1988
Karen Lemke v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. Roper Corporation
Citations
- 853 F.2d 253
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10646
- 1988 WL 80815
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding case for reconsideration of a non-party’s claims that they were released from liability by a prior contract even though the court “strongly question[ed] whether the language of the . . . release evidenced a clear intent to benefit” the non-party
- remanding case for reconsideration of a non-party’s claims that they were released from liability by a prior contract even though the court “strongly question[ed] whether the language of the . . . release evidenced a clear intent to benefit” the non-party
- remanding case for reconsideration of a non-party’s claims that they were released from liability by a prior contract even though the court “strongly question[ed] whether the language of the . . . release evidenced a clear intent to benefit” the non-party
- remanding case for reconsideration of a non-party’s claims that they were released from liability by a prior contract even though the court “strongly question[ed] whether the language of the . . . release evidenced a clear intent to benefit” the non-party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winter, Hall, MacKenzie, Eastern, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.