Karen L. Kasper v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing an employer’s criticism of a plaintiff’s performance before the plaintiff engaged in protected activity diminished any inference of causation
• stating this prima facie case for retaliation claims under both Title VII and the ICRA
• “Evidence of an employer’s concerns about an employee’s performance before the employee’s protected activity undercuts a finding of causation”
• “Evidence of an employer’s concerns about an employee’s performance before the employee’s protected activity undercuts a finding of causation.”
• “Evidence of an employer’s concerns about an employee’s performance before the employee’s protected activity undercuts a finding of causation.” (citation omitted)
• “Evidence of an employer’s concerns about an employee’s performance before the employee’s protected activity undercuts a finding of causation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).