Karen C. Roebuck v. Andrew Paul Christensen (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring proof of an inter vivos gift where stepson was agent under power of attorney, and existence of commingling of funds not mentioned as breach of fiduciary duty
• deadman's statute bars testimony about acts \`by and between the parties for the benefit or detriment of one or both of the parties'\
• dead man’s statute may be waived when the protected party introduces evidence regarding a transaction with the deceased
• deadman’s statute bars testimony about acts “ ‘by and between the parties for the benefit or detriment of one or both of the parties’ ” (quoting Bentzen v. Demmons, 68 Wn. App. 339, 344, 842 P.2d 1015 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).