Skip to main content
· 7/28/2003

Karen Bauries King v. Marriott International, Incorporated Karl I. Fredericks

Citations

  • 337 F.3d 421
  • 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2619
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “in some cases, federal law so completely sweeps away State law that any action purportedly brought under State law is transformed into a federal action that can be brought originally in, or removed to, federal court”
  • \a vital feature of complete preemption is the existence of a federal cause of action that replaces the preempted cause of action\
  • first quoting Custer v. Sweeney, 89 F.3d 1156, 1165 (4th Cir. 1996); and then citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Luttig, Shedd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.